Scaling participatory design to de-risk enterprise Identity and Access Management decisions
VMware Cloud Services needed to redesign its Identity and Access Management (IAM) experience—a complex, high-risk domain where usability failures have serious operational consequences.
Traditional one-off usability testing wasn't sufficient. The team needed continuous customer input across multiple design iterations to avoid costly missteps.
VMware had to decide how to redesign IAM while balancing:
The risk: shipping an experience that technically worked but failed to align with how enterprise customers actually manage access.
I designed and led an 8-week participatory research program, engaging customers as ongoing collaborators rather than episodic test participants.
I was responsible for:
We recruited 135 IAM customers from a pool of 3,000 and engaged them weekly over eight weeks, allowing the team to test ideas, validate mental models, and iterate continuously rather than in isolation.
Enterprise users conceptualized IAM through distinct administrative roles (organization owner, user admin, service admin). Designs that didn't respect these mental models created confusion and errors.

Users wanted multiple ways to complete the same task, depending on organizational context. Rigid, linear flows felt brittle and unrealistic for enterprise environments.
Customers who helped shape the experience felt invested in the outcome and more confident in the final design—reducing resistance to change and increasing trust.
The participatory model itself became a template for future initiatives.
This work showed how longitudinal, participatory research can: